Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma CompanyNanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company
VS
Torrent Pharmaceuticals LtdTorrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

Franklin House, Cwmbran, undefined, NP44 3WY, GB

Last Update: 04/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://nanopharm.co.uk
752/1000Fair

Nanopharm was founded to address industry-wide challenges in converting drugs from concept into viable, effective and consistent nasal and orally inhaled drug products. The company has established itself as a leading provider of tailored analytical and formulation su...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:68
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Ahmedabad, 380015, IN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.torrentpharma.com
794/1000Fair

Torrent Pharma, with annual revenues of more than Rs 10,700 crores, is the flagship Company of the Torrent Group, with group revenues of Rs 41,000 crores. It is ranked 5th in the Indian Pharma Market and is among the Top 5 in the therapeutic segments of Cardiovascular (...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:11,552
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company or Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company or Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9