Comparison Overview
Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company
Franklin House, Cwmbran, undefined, NP44 3WY, GB
Last Update: 04/01/2026
Nanopharm was founded to address industry-wide challenges in converting drugs from concept into viable, effective and consistent nasal and orally inhaled drug products. The company has established itself as a leading provider of tailored analytical and formulation su...

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Ahmedabad, 380015, IN
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Torrent Pharma, with annual revenues of more than Rs 10,700 crores, is the flagship Company of the Torrent Group, with group revenues of Rs 41,000 crores. It is ranked 5th in the Indian Pharma Market and is among the Top 5 in the therapeutic segments of Cardiovascular (...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company







Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company in 2026.
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd in 2026.
Incident History - Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Nanopharm Ltd, an Aptar Pharma Company

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.