Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.
VS
CitiCiti
Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.

Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.

A-109, Sector 136, Noida, 201304, IN

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://nangia-andersen.com
755/1000Fair

Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. is a member firm of Andersen Global, a premier professional services firm, adding value to the business of its clients for more than three decades. We do this by providing a wide range of services in the financial space which range from g...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:128
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Citi

Citi

388 Greenwich Street, New York, 10013, US

Last Update: 04/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.citigroup.com
795/1000Fair

Citi's mission is to serve as a trusted partner to our clients by responsibly providing financial services that enable growth and economic progress. Our core activities are safeguarding assets, lending money, making payments and accessing the capital markets on behalf o...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:200,467
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.

Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Citi

Citi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Citi in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Citi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.

Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Citi

Citi

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CITWELNAVUSAFID1771266975
🔒 Incident : Breach
CITJPM1776832106
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CIT0362322

FAQ

Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. company and Citi company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. and Citi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. and Citi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. or Citi ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. or Citi ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. and Citi, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nangia Andersen India Pvt. Ltd. and Citi, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA