Comparison Overview

NAMI Seattle

VS

Woodbridge Therapy Group

NAMI Seattle

802 NW 70th Street, Seattle, WA, 98117, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

NAMI Seattle is the only organization in the Seattle area working specifically to fill the gaps in our local mental health system through education, referrals, and support. We offer classes and support groups at no cost, connecting people with shared experiences and providing guidance on how to navigate an increasingly insufficient and complex mental health system. We are there to listen and provide resources to those in need. When one more "Press 5"​ phone tree might just make up give up and lose hope, we are but one call away. Our Mission: To address the unmet mental health needs within our community through support, referral, education, and outreach. Our Vision: A world where all those impacted by mental illness know they are not alone and are empowered to live a fulfilling life. Our Values: Kindness Community Environment Integrity Racial Equity

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Woodbridge Therapy Group

2680 Opitz Blvd, Woodbridge, Virginia, US, 22192
Last Update: 2026-01-16

Established over 10 years ago, we originally opened as Prince William Family Counseling and provided the community with trustworthy therapy services in a safe, welcoming environment. In 2015 the agency was purchased and took on new ownership and we became Woodbridge Therapy Group. With the recent change in ownership, we have expanded our number of providers, added more services, and renewed our investment in the community. Mental Health Counseling Sessions for a Peaceful State of Mind Counseling and therapy are both great ways to work through problems that you may not be aware of, help you gain insight into great ways to deal with these issues, and gives you time to release any stress you may be keeping inside yourself. Our providers use a variety of therapy approaches and will determine which should be used based on your individual set of needs. From a practice perspective, we also approach care from a holistic, person-in-environment lens, appreciating all dimensions of the person, including their dynamic in mind, body, and spirit. Whether you're dealing with the loss of a family member, stress, or depression; our providers will work one-on-one with you in a safe setting and provide you with a friendly ear that listens and never judges.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-greater-seattle.jpeg
NAMI Seattle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodbridge-therapy-group.jpeg
Woodbridge Therapy Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NAMI Seattle
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Woodbridge Therapy Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAMI Seattle in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woodbridge Therapy Group in 2026.

Incident History — NAMI Seattle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAMI Seattle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Woodbridge Therapy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woodbridge Therapy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-greater-seattle.jpeg
NAMI Seattle
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodbridge-therapy-group.jpeg
Woodbridge Therapy Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Woodbridge Therapy Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAMI Seattle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Woodbridge Therapy Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NAMI Seattle company.

In the current year, Woodbridge Therapy Group company and NAMI Seattle company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Woodbridge Therapy Group company nor NAMI Seattle company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Woodbridge Therapy Group company nor NAMI Seattle company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Woodbridge Therapy Group company nor NAMI Seattle company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NAMI Seattle company nor Woodbridge Therapy Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NAMI Seattle nor Woodbridge Therapy Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NAMI Seattle company nor Woodbridge Therapy Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Woodbridge Therapy Group company employs more people globally than NAMI Seattle company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither NAMI Seattle nor Woodbridge Therapy Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NAMI Seattle nor Woodbridge Therapy Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NAMI Seattle nor Woodbridge Therapy Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NAMI Seattle nor Woodbridge Therapy Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NAMI Seattle nor Woodbridge Therapy Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NAMI Seattle nor Woodbridge Therapy Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N