Comparison Overview

Nagarro

VS

Capita

Nagarro

Munich, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Nagarro helps future-proof your business through a forward-thinking, fluidic, and CARING mindset. We excel at digital engineering and help our clients become human-centric, digital-first organizations, augmenting their ability to be responsive, efficient, intimate, creative, and sustainable. Today, we are 18,000+ experts across 38 countries, forming a Nation of Nagarrians, ready to help our customers succeed.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 21,481
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Capita

2 Kingdom Street, First Floor, London, England, GB, W2 6BD
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 550 and 599

Capita is an outsourcer, helping clients across the public and private sectors run complex business processes more efficiently, creating better consumer experiences. Operating across eight countries, Capita’s 34,000 colleagues support primarily UK and European clients with people-based services underpinned by market-leading technology. We’re a vital support service for our clients, enabling the everyday interactions that we expect to run seamlessly, to run seamlessly. A publicly listed business with adjusted revenue of £2.4bn, Capita’s areas of focus are Central Government, Local Public Service, Defence, Learning, Fire & Security, Contact Centres and Pensions Solutions. We’re embracing change to respond to the ever-changing needs of society, creating better outcomes for all our stakeholders.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 25,516
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nagarro.jpeg
Nagarro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capita.jpeg
Capita
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nagarro
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capita
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nagarro in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capita in 2026.

Incident History — Nagarro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nagarro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nagarro.jpeg
Nagarro
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capita.jpeg
Capita
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Access to internal Microsoft Office 365 apps
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious File Download (Phishing/Social Engineering)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Demand, Data Exfiltration for Leverage)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Nagarro company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capita company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Capita company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Nagarro company has not reported any.

In the current year, Capita company and Nagarro company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Capita company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Nagarro company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Capita company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Nagarro company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Capita company nor Nagarro company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nagarro company nor Capita company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nagarro nor Capita holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nagarro company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Capita company.

Capita company employs more people globally than Nagarro company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Nagarro nor Capita holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nagarro nor Capita holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nagarro nor Capita holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nagarro nor Capita holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nagarro nor Capita holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nagarro nor Capita holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N