Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nabors IndustriesNabors Industries
VS
ShellShell
Nabors Industries

Nabors Industries

515 West Greens Road, Houston, Texas, 77067, US

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nabors.com
746/1000Moderate

Nabors Industries is a leading provider of advanced technology for the energy industry. With operations in approximately 20 countries, Nabors has established a global network of people, technology and equipment to deploy solutions that deliver safe, efficient and respon...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:6,881
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Shell

Shell

York Road, London, SE1 7NA, GB

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.shell.com
806/1000Good

Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, employing 96,000 people across 70+ countries. We serve around 1 million commercial and industrial customers, and around 33 million customers daily at our Shell-branded retail service stations. Our purpose i...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:185,291
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nabors Industries

Nabors Industries

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shell

Shell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nabors Industries in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Shell has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Nabors Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nabors Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nabors Industries

Nabors Industries

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Shell

Shell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AST-TESHE1773679185
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
OFCK&LAONPROKIRSHEPWCMOV1781843490

FAQ

Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nabors Industries company and Shell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nabors Industries and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nabors Industries and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nabors Industries or Shell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nabors Industries or Shell ?
Between Nabors Industries and Shell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nabors Industries and Shell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA