Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
N-able

N-able Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

n-able.com

N-able’s mission is to protect businesses against evolving cyberthreats with a unified cyber resiliency platform to manage, secure, and recover. Our scalable technology infrastructure includes AI-powered capabilities, market-leading third-party integrations, and the flexibility to employ technologies of choice—to transform workflows and deliver critical security outcomes. Our partner-first approach combines our products with experts, training, and peer-led events that empower our customers to be secure, resilient, and successful.


N-able A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

N-able
Company Information
Website:http://www.n-able.com
Employees number:2,307
Number of followers:75,805
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:n-able.com
N-able Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
N-ableComputer and Network Security
Updated:
02/08/2026
752/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
N-able Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
N-ableComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

N-able
N-ableFair
Current Score
752Baa (FAIR)
01000
2 incidents
-58.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
661Before Incident
Vulnerability
02 Aug 2026N-able
N-able: MSP Platform Security Breach: N-able Flaw

N-able N-central Vulnerability Exposes MSP Platform Risks Amid Growing Security Scrutiny

656After Incident
CRITICAL-5
N-A1785695271
N-able N-central Vulnerability Exposes MSP Platform Risks Amid Growing Security Scrutiny On August 1, 2026, N-able disclosed active exploitation of a vulnerability in its N-central platform, affecting customers running versions prior to 2026.2. The company urged immediate upgrades to version 2026.3 to mitigate risks, though technical details of the exploit remain undisclosed. The incident underscores the high-stakes security challenges facing managed service providers (MSPs), where a single compromised management tool can grant attackers lateral access to thousands of downstream endpoints. The vulnerability highlights a critical weakness in MSP ecosystems: patch adoption delays. While N-able’s rapid response issuing a patch and advisory demonstrates urgency, fragmented customer environments often slow remediation, leaving organizations exposed during upgrade cycles. The incident arrives as enterprises increasingly scrutinize platform-level security governance, with 66.9% of organizations now requiring third-party monitoring tools to include security capabilities, per Futurum Research. The broader market context amplifies the stakes. The software lifecycle engineering sector is projected to grow from $235 billion in 2025 to $344 billion by 2028, driven by demand for AI-driven observability and incident response. Already, 57% of organizations use automated root cause analysis, and 45.3% employ AI-assisted log analysis tools that could help detect anomalous activity from compromised MSP platforms before breaches propagate. Enterprise governance mandates are also raising the bar for vendors. 58.6% of organizations now require automated test coverage for AI-generated code, while 45.1% mandate audit logging of AI agent actions. These trends signal a shift toward vendor accountability, where procurement teams increasingly prioritize patch cadence, transparency, and security architecture in platform evaluations. Key developments to monitor include: - Patch adoption rates: Whether N-able’s customer base migrates to 2026.3 quickly, and if the company publishes remediation metrics. - Exploit scope: If N-able’s ongoing investigation reveals the full attack vector, affected customer count, or evidence of downstream compromise. - Competitive fallout: How rival MSP vendors leverage this incident in Q4 2026 sales cycles to differentiate on security. - Procurement shifts: Whether enterprises add MSP platform patch-cadence and audit-logging requirements to vendor scorecards.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: N-central platform (versions prior to 2026.2)Operational Impact: Potential lateral access to thousands of downstream endpoints
JULY 2026
661Before Incident
JUNE 2026
659Before Incident
MAY 2026
754Before Incident
APRIL 2026
754Before Incident
MARCH 2026
754Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
754Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
754Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
754Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
754Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
754Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
752Before Incident
Ransomware
18 Sep 2025N-able
Fortra

Critical Zero-Day Exploitation in Fortra’s GoAnywhere MFT Leading to Medusa Ransomware Attacks

640After Incident
CRITICAL-112
FOR0532805100725
A critical CVE-2025-10035 (CVSS 10.0) vulnerability in Fortra’s GoAnywhere Managed File Transfer (MFT) tool was actively exploited as a zero-day by threat group Storm-1175 before its patch on September 18, 2025. The flaw, a deserialization vulnerability in the License Servlet Admin Console, allowed attackers to bypass signature verification, execute arbitrary commands, and achieve remote code execution (RCE) without authentication. Post-exploitation, attackers conducted system discovery, lateral movement via RMM tools (SimpleHelp, MeshAgent), and deployed Medusa ransomware in at least one victim environment. Data exfiltration was facilitated using Rclone, while Cloudflare tunnels secured C2 communications. With 513 exposed GoAnywhere instances globally (majority in North America), the attack posed severe risks, including long-term system compromise, ransomware deployment, and potential data theft. Medusa, linked to over 300 global victims (including a US healthcare organization in 2025), leverages phishing and unpatched vulnerabilities for initial access, escalating threats to critical infrastructure.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Zero-day exploitationRansomware attackUnauthenticated remote code execution
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (ransomware)Data exfiltrationLong-term access for lateral movement
IMPACT
Systems Affected: 513 exposed GoAnywhere MFT instances (363 in North America)System discoveryLateral movementRansomware deployment (Medusa)Data exfiltration via RclonePotential reputational damage for FortraTrust erosion in GoAnywhere MFT users
DATA BREACH
Observed via Rclone in at least one victim environmentMedusa ransomware encryption

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for N-able ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on N-able's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with N-able ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view N-able's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?