Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MyGlamm | Good Glamm GroupMyGlamm | Good Glamm Group
VS
NothingNothing
MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group

MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group

Juhu Road, Mumbai, 400049, IN

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.myglamm.com/
770/1000Fair

MyGlamm is India’s fastest growing direct-to-consumer beauty brand. MyGlamm embraces the philosophy of building a community with its users, engaging with them and eventually co-creating products with them. In July 2020, MyGlamm acquired POPxo making the MyGlamm - POPxo ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:466
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nothing

Nothing

John Street, London, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://nothing.tech
784/1000Fair

Nothing exists to make tech feel exciting again. We’re building a different kind of company, one that puts design, emotion, and human creativity at the heart of everything we do. From the way our products look to how they sound, feel, and function, we care about the de...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:28,896
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group

MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nothing

Nothing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Nothing has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nothing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nothing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group

MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nothing

Nothing

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TANKRANOTMEDCOI1773311566

FAQ

Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group company and Nothing company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group and Nothing, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group and Nothing, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group or Nothing ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group or Nothing ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group and Nothing, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MyGlamm | Good Glamm Group and Nothing, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1