Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mutakamela InsuranceMutakamela Insurance
VS
Progressive InsuranceProgressive Insurance
Mutakamela Insurance

Mutakamela Insurance

Khorias Road, Riyadh, undefined, 11481, SA

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://mutakamela.sa/
748/1000Moderate

Insurance you can trust

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:326
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

300 North Commons Blvd, Mayfield Village, 44143, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
653/1000Weak

Every journey has a beginning, and wherever you are on your career path, we want to help you along the way. At Progressive, we exist to help people move forward and live fully. We strive to create a welcoming and flexible work environment for everyone, where employees ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:44,203
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mutakamela Insurance

Mutakamela Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mutakamela Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progressive Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mutakamela Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mutakamela Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Progressive Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progressive Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mutakamela Insurance

Mutakamela Insurance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO3292632101525
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO1014090725

FAQ

Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mutakamela Insurance or Progressive Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mutakamela Insurance or Progressive Insurance ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mutakamela Insurance and Progressive Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA