Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Musick, Peeler & GarrettMusick, Peeler & Garrett
VS
DLA PiperDLA Piper
Musick, Peeler & Garrett

Musick, Peeler & Garrett

333 S Hope St, Suite 2900, Los Angeles, California, US, 90071

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.musickpeeler.com
728/1000Moderate

Musick Peeler, a premier law firm with over 80 attorneys across five offices in major commercial centers of California, exemplifies excellence in legal service. Known for its comprehensive suite of legal services, the firm has grown in tandem with California's expansion...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:194
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

160 Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4HT, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlapiper.com
782/1000Fair

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:13,333
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Musick, Peeler & Garrett

Musick, Peeler & Garrett

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Musick, Peeler & Garrett in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Musick, Peeler & Garrett (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Musick, Peeler & Garrett cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Musick, Peeler & Garrett

Musick, Peeler & Garrett

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MUS633072725
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and DLA Piper company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Musick, Peeler & Garrett or DLA Piper ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Musick, Peeler & Garrett or DLA Piper ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett and DLA Piper, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Musick, Peeler & Garrett and DLA Piper, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-55175
SUMMARY

Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44383
SUMMARY

Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42952
SUMMARY

Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-20744
SUMMARY

The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-15089
SUMMARY

vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA