Comparison Overview

Museum of the Bible

VS

Cap Sciences

Museum of the Bible

400 4th St SW, Washington, DC, 20024, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Making its grand opening to the public in November 2017, Museum of the Bible’s 430,000-square-foot building is located just three blocks from the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. Museum of the Bible aims to be among the most technologically advanced and engaging museums in the world. Showcasing rare and fascinating artifacts spanning 3,500 years of history, the museum offers visitors an immersive and personalized experience with the Bible, and its ongoing impact on the world around us.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 223
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cap Sciences

Esplanade du Professeur Tournesol, Bordeaux, 33300, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 750 and 799

Au cœur de la métropole bordelaise, Cap Sciences offre au public un lieu pour explorer les sciences et les techniques : expositions, animations, manifestations. En Aquitaine et au-delà, Cap Sciences propose un catalogue d'expositions itinérantes, d'ateliers découverte, de mallettes pédagogiques et d'animations ludiques. Concevoir et réaliser des productions et des manifestations culturelles, accompagner des projets éducatifs, accueillir et animer, éditer et diffuser, autant de savoir-faire que Cap Sciences met au service de ses partenaires. Cap Sciences est situé sur les quais de Bordeaux, au bord du fleuve dans un bâtiment moderne conçu pour accueillir les visiteurs et organiser des événements et séminaires.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-the-bible.jpeg
Museum of the Bible
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cap-sciences.jpeg
Cap Sciences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of the Bible
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cap Sciences
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of the Bible in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cap Sciences in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of the Bible (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of the Bible cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cap Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cap Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-the-bible.jpeg
Museum of the Bible
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cap-sciences.jpeg
Cap Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of the Bible company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cap Sciences company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cap Sciences company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of the Bible company.

In the current year, Cap Sciences company and Museum of the Bible company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cap Sciences company nor Museum of the Bible company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cap Sciences company nor Museum of the Bible company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cap Sciences company nor Museum of the Bible company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of the Bible company nor Cap Sciences company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of the Bible nor Cap Sciences holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of the Bible company nor Cap Sciences company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of the Bible company employs more people globally than Cap Sciences company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of the Bible nor Cap Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of the Bible nor Cap Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of the Bible nor Cap Sciences holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of the Bible nor Cap Sciences holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of the Bible nor Cap Sciences holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of the Bible nor Cap Sciences holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H