Comparison Overview

Museum of Sex

VS

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid

Museum of Sex

233 Fifth Ave, NYC, New York, 10016, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Mission of the Museum of Sex is to preserve and present the history, evolution and cultural significance of human sexuality. The Museum produces exhibitions, publications and programs that bring the best of current scholarship to the widest possible audiences and is committed to encouraging public enlightenment, discourse and engagement.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid

Media Park, Media Parkboulevard 1, Hilversum, Noord Holland, NL, 1217 WE
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Netherlands Institute for Sound & Vision (Sound & Vision) maintains and provides access to over 70 per cent of the Dutch audio-visual heritage, comprising more than one million hours of television, radio, music and film, making it one of the largest audiovisual archives in Europe. Sound & Vision combines the highest professional standards concerning the release and storage of material, with easy access for its users, by using state of the art systems for asset management and storage. Sound & Vision is the business archive of the national broadcasting corporations as well as a cultural heritage institute. Sound & Vision has brought thousands of hours of archive footage on-line for educational use and also operates a facility for the general public, the Media Experience, which is visited by 200,000 people annually. In 2007, the seven-year Images for the Future programme was launched. The project, funded with a budget of €154 million from the FES Fund, will realise the digitisation of the Netherlands’ audiovisual memory in a process whereby Sound & Vision will conserve and digitise 17,500 hours of film, 124,000 hours of audio, 137,000 hours of video and 1.2 million photos. This material will be made available for (broadcast) professionals, education and the general public. In the scope of this project, Sound & Vision is experimenting with crowdsourcing.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 352
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-sex.jpeg
Museum of Sex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beeld-en-geluid.jpeg
Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Sex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Sex in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of Sex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Sex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-sex.jpeg
Museum of Sex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beeld-en-geluid.jpeg
Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Sex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Sex company.

In the current year, Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company and Museum of Sex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company nor Museum of Sex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company nor Museum of Sex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company nor Museum of Sex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Sex company nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Museum of Sex company.

Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid company employs more people globally than Museum of Sex company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H