Comparison Overview
Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd

Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd
Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd., Dublin 18, undefined, undefined, IE
Last Update: 10/03/2026
Munich Re Automation Solutions has been at the forefront of the digital revolution in insurance for over 30 years. We have a proven track record of working with forward-thinking customers to unlock new sources of revenue and greater customer satisfaction. We’ve made it ...

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US
Last Update: 18/09/2026
A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that ma...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd













Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Google has 5380.77% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Munich Re Automation Solutions Ltd

FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.