Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Multisteel | Tata Steel NederlandMultisteel | Tata Steel Nederland
VS
SandvikSandvik
Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland

Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland

Fregatweg 44 b, Maastricht, 6222 NZ, NL

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile

MultiSteel offers one of the broadest multi-metal ranges in Europe, including HRP, CRC, HDG, DSP and OCS. Our facilities convert wide and light gauge strip coil into precision slit coil, de-coiled sheets, and multi-strand blanks with widths up to 1.85m; thickness from ...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:76
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sandvik

Sandvik

Kungsbron 1, Stockholm, 111 22, SE

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://home.sandvik
814/1000Good

Sandvik is a global, high-tech engineering group providing solutions that enhance productivity, profitability and sustainability for the manufacturing, mining and infrastructure industries. We are at the forefront of digitalization and focus on optimizing our customers’...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:33,567
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland

Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sandvik

Sandvik

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandvik in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sandvik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandvik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland

Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sandvik

Sandvik

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland company and Sandvik company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland and Sandvik, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland and Sandvik, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland or Sandvik ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland or Sandvik ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland and Sandvik, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Multisteel | Tata Steel Nederland and Sandvik, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3