Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MUJI U.S.A. LimitedMUJI U.S.A. Limited
VS
GPAGPA
MUJI U.S.A. Limited

MUJI U.S.A. Limited

10018, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.muji.us
844/1000Good

MUJI, originally founded in Japan, sells a wide variety of household, apparel and food products since 1980. From its beginning, MUJI has been committed to streamlining processes, selection of materials and simplification of packaging to provide good quality products at ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:371
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
GPA

GPA

Avenida Brigadeiro Luís Antônio 3172, São Paulo, 01402000, BR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gpabr.com
814/1000Good

We are one of the largest food retail companies in Brazil. We were pioneers with a multi-format and multi-channel business model that brings together renowned chains and brands such as Pão de Açúcar and Extra, Minuto Pão de Açúcar, Pão de Açúcar Fresh and Mini Extra. In...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:25,350
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MUJI U.S.A. Limited

MUJI U.S.A. Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GPA

GPA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MUJI U.S.A. Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MUJI U.S.A. Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MUJI U.S.A. Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MUJI U.S.A. Limited

MUJI U.S.A. Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MUJ200072625
GPA

GPA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited company and GPA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited and GPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited and GPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MUJI U.S.A. Limited or GPA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MUJI U.S.A. Limited or GPA ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited and GPA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MUJI U.S.A. Limited and GPA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1