Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.
VS
QBE InsuranceQBE Insurance
Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.

Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.

Avenida Miguel Bombarda 4 - piso 9, Lisboa, Lisboa, 1049-079, PT

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mudum-seguros.pt
751/1000Fair

A Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S. A. (Mudum Seguros) iniciou a sua atividade em 1 de outubro de 1996. Fazendo parte do Grupo Credit Agricole, líder europeu nas atividades de banca seguros, tem a missão principal de servir o segmento de mercado de particulares e pequena...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:102
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
QBE Insurance

QBE Insurance

388 George Street, Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2000

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.qbe.com
789/1000Fair

At QBE we’re driven by our purpose of enabling a more resilient future. QBE is an international insurer and reinsurer headquartered in Sydney, Australia, with local presence in 26 countries. We don't just see ourselves as an insurer, but a partner to our customers i...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,066
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.

Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
QBE Insurance

QBE Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QBE Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - QBE Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QBE Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.

Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
QBE Insurance

QBE Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
QBE1779179280

FAQ

Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. company and QBE Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. and QBE Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. and QBE Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. or QBE Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. or QBE Insurance ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. and QBE Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mudum - Companhia de Seguros, S.A. and QBE Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1