Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MTS - DESAMIANTAGEMTS - DESAMIANTAGE
VS
Burns & McDonnellBurns & McDonnell
MTS - DESAMIANTAGE

MTS - DESAMIANTAGE

16, Rue Jules Verne, Chaponost, 69630, FR

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

MTS est une entreprise filiale de FREYSSINET FRANCE. Notre société est spécialisée dans le désamiantage, le déplombage et la dépollution. MTS exerce ces activités dans de nombreux secteurs : - Le Bâtiment - L'Industrie - Les Ouvrages d'Art - Les Sinistres No...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:16
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burnsmcd.com
783/1000Fair

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenge...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15,385
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MTS - DESAMIANTAGE

MTS - DESAMIANTAGE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MTS - DESAMIANTAGE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MTS - DESAMIANTAGE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MTS - DESAMIANTAGE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MTS - DESAMIANTAGE

MTS - DESAMIANTAGE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MTS - DESAMIANTAGE or Burns & McDonnell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MTS - DESAMIANTAGE or Burns & McDonnell ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MTS - DESAMIANTAGE and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53465
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, a crafted multi-frame can result in a heap buffer over-write when encoding it with the SF3 encoder. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53464
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, when providing invalid options to the wand option parser a small memory leak will occur. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53463
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when passing incorrect arguments in the distort operation a null pointer deference will occur. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-53462
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when an allocation fails in CheckPrimitiveExtent this can result in a heap-use-after-free and result in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-53461
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, an incorrect loop in the ICON decoder can result in an out of bounds heap write resulting in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9