Comparison Overview
MTN Afghanistan

MTN Afghanistan
Opposite to Shar-e-Naw Park, PD10, Kabul, 25000, AF
Last Update: 28/02/2026
Description: Welcome to MTN Afghanistan Official LinkedIn account, for self-service, to recharge or check your account balance, buy airtime, voice, SMS & data bundles, send credit, get a loan download and use MyMTN App from the below links: Play Store: bit.ly/3nd6pr6 ...

e& UAE
Sheikh Rashid Bin Saeed Al Maktoum Street, Abu Dhabi, AE, 3838
Last Update: 30/05/2026
(Formerly etisalat UAE) For more than four decades, we have connected people and now we’ve evolved to become the digital telco of the future. Our mission is to grow, transform and excel as the region’s technology leader while enhancing digital customer experience and o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MTN Afghanistan







e& UAE






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MTN Afghanistan in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for e& UAE in 2026.
Incident History - MTN Afghanistan (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MTN Afghanistan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - e& UAE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
e& UAE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MTN Afghanistan

e& UAE
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.