Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USADoctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA
VS
Transport for LondonTransport for London
Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA

Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA

40 Rector Street, New York, NY, 10006, US

Last Update: 01/01/2026

View Profile
758/1000Fair

Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is an international medical humanitarian organization that helps people affected by conflict, epidemics, disasters, or exclusion from health care in more than 70 countries. Our teams are made up of tens of thousands...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:369
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transport for London

Transport for London

5 Endeavour Square, Westfield Avenue,, London , E20 1JN, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/about
795/1000Fair

Every day, we help millions of people to make journeys across London: By Tube, bus, tram, car, bike – and more. People don’t associate us with journeys by river, on foot or via the air, but we help with that, too. Getting people to where they need to go has been our bus...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:18,421
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA

Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transport for London

Transport for London

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for London in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transport for London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA

Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transport for London

Transport for London

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TRA5292652112125
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TRA4592245102425
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA0662706102725

FAQ

Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA company and Transport for London company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA and Transport for London, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA and Transport for London, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA or Transport for London ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA or Transport for London ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA and Transport for London, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières - USA and Transport for London, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-50044
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44955
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42933
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-40430
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-28698
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9