Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) HaarlemMSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem
VS
ServierServier
MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem

MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem

N/A

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.werkenbijmsd.nl
770/1000Fair

MMD Haarlem produceert, verpakt en distribueert op hoge kwaliteit medicijnen. De tabletten in potjes en blisters, tot aan poeders worden via Haarlem naar meer dan 140 landen getransporteerd.

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Servier

Servier

50 rue Carnot, Suresnes, FR, 92150

Last Update: 24/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://servier.com
788/1000Fair

Servier is an independent international pharmaceutical group governed by a foundation. With its unique governance model, the Group is committed to therapeutic progress to serve patients and integrates the patient voice at every stage of the medicine life cycle. As a le...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:14,468
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem

MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Servier

Servier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Servier in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Servier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Servier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem

MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Servier

Servier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem company and Servier company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem and Servier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem and Servier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem or Servier ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem or Servier ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem and Servier, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MSD Manufacturing Division (MMD) Haarlem and Servier, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103761
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in TransferMetadata::receivePeerNotify that allows unauthenticated attackers to grow process memory without limit. Attackers can repeatedly send notify frames up to 1 MB to the handshake RPC port, filling the uncapped notifys vector until the out-of-memory killer terminates the engine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103760
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to block the handshake daemon by never reading replies. Attackers can send a Metadata request to the handshake RPC port and stall SocketHandShakePlugin's single listener thread in writeFully(), breaking all subsequent handshakes, metadata fetches, notify and probe requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-71427
SUMMARY

Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server through 2.0.7 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows MCP callers to write and read files outside the working directory by supplying absolute paths or ../ sequences. Attackers can steer an AI agent via prompt injection to abuse save_presentation, open_presentation, or manage_image output_path to overwrite any server-writable file or load external files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86344
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-71454
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in CWE-79 - Cross-site Scripting CAPEC-63 allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects CAPEC-63: before 3.0b63.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA