Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MSD DeutschlandMSD Deutschland
VS
SandozSandoz
MSD Deutschland

MSD Deutschland

Levelingstraße 4a, München, 81673, DE

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Bei MSD, in den USA und Kanada bekannt als Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, eint uns ein Ziel: Wir nutzen führende wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse, um auf der ganzen Welt Leben zu retten und mehr Lebensqualität zu ermöglichen. Bereits seit über 130 Jahren stehen wir d...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:1,982
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sandoz

Sandoz

Novartis Campus, Basel, Basel-Stadt, CH, 4056

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.sandoz.com
804/1000Good

Sandoz is the global leader in generic and biosimilar medicines. ​ ​Our Purpose is to pioneer access to medicines for patients globally. We are on a mission to drive innovation in the healthcare industry by freeing up resources sustainably and responsibly while continu...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:17,347
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MSD Deutschland

MSD Deutschland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sandoz

Sandoz

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSD Deutschland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandoz in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MSD Deutschland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSD Deutschland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sandoz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandoz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MSD Deutschland

MSD Deutschland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sandoz

Sandoz

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MSD Deutschland company and Sandoz company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MSD Deutschland and Sandoz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MSD Deutschland and Sandoz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MSD Deutschland or Sandoz ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MSD Deutschland or Sandoz ?
Between MSD Deutschland and Sandoz, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MSD Deutschland and Sandoz, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8