Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MSD DanmarkMSD Danmark
VS
Novo NordiskNovo Nordisk
MSD Danmark

MSD Danmark

Havneholmen 25, 2 sal, København, 1561, DK

Last Update: 10/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.msd.dk
752/1000Fair

MSD Denmark is a supplier to the Danish healthcare system – we have been inventing for life for more than a century and have done it in Denmark since 1969. In Denmark, we are represented by 200 ambitious employees, joining forces and strengths to make a difference in th...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:96
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk

Novo Alle, Bagsværd, 2880, DK

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.novonordisk.com
659/1000Weak

We’re not your typical healthcare company. In a modern world of quick fixes, we focus on solutions to defeat serious chronic disease and create long-term health. We seek out new ideas and put people first as we push the boundaries of science, make healthcare more acces...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:62,361
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MSD Danmark

MSD Danmark

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSD Danmark in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Novo Nordisk has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MSD Danmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSD Danmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Novo Nordisk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novo Nordisk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MSD Danmark

MSD Danmark

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ABBNOV1787754614
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOV1781951217
🔒 Incident : Breach
NOV1781195765

FAQ

Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MSD Danmark company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MSD Danmark and Novo Nordisk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MSD Danmark and Novo Nordisk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MSD Danmark or Novo Nordisk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MSD Danmark or Novo Nordisk ?
Between MSD Danmark and Novo Nordisk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MSD Danmark and Novo Nordisk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-22061
SUMMARY

Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108269
SUMMARY

Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108268
SUMMARY

Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108267
SUMMARY

Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92705
SUMMARY

Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS`  file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8