Comparison Overview
MSCI Private Assets
MSCI Private Assets
250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, US, NY 10007
Last Update: 03/04/2026
MSCI is the premier independent source of private markets intelligence in the world. Investors partner with us to improve performance benchmarking, risk assessment, and capital allocation decisions across public and private markets. With decision-grade data sourced dire...
Goldman Sachs
200 West Street, New York, 10282, US
Last Update: 12/10/2026
We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity, and excellence. Operating at the center of capital markets, we act as one firm, mobilizing our people, capital, and ideas to deli...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
MSCI Private Assets
Goldman Sachs
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MSCI Private Assets in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Goldman Sachs has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - MSCI Private Assets (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MSCI Private Assets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Goldman Sachs (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Goldman Sachs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
MSCI Private Assets
Goldman Sachs
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.