Comparison Overview

MSC Cruises

VS

BCD Travel

MSC Cruises

Avenue Eugene Pittard, Geneva, Geneva, 1206, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, MSC Cruises is the world’s third largest cruise lines and the market leader in Europe, South America, the Middle East and Southern Africa, with a strong and growing presence in North America and the Far East. The MSC Cruises fleet consists of 22 modern ships with three new vessels due to be launched in 2025, 2026, and 2027. The Company operates in more than 100 countries around the world, offering cruises across five continents, calling at more than 240 destinations and welcoming more than 180 different nationalities on board. MSC Cruises is firmly committed to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions for its marine operations by 2050.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 16,009
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BCD Travel

Europalaan 300, None, Utrecht, None, NL, 3526 KS
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

BCD Travel helps companies travel smart and achieve more. We drive program adoption, cost savings and talent retention through digital experiences that simplify business travel. Our 15,000+ dedicated team members service clients in 170+ countries as we shape a sustainable future for business travel. BCD’s leading meetings and events management and global consultancy services complete our comprehensive suite of solutions for all aspects of corporate travel. In 2024, BCD achieved US$22.9 billion in sales. For more information, visit our website. You can also subscribe to our newsletter for the latest industry insights, thought-leader analysis and top tips to drive your successful travel program. Go to: http://ow.ly/N73i50Mhc9Y

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 16,334
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-cruises.jpeg
MSC Cruises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcd-travel.jpeg
BCD Travel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MSC Cruises
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BCD Travel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSC Cruises in 2025.

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCD Travel in 2025.

Incident History — MSC Cruises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSC Cruises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BCD Travel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCD Travel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-cruises.jpeg
MSC Cruises
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcd-travel.jpeg
BCD Travel
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

MSC Cruises company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BCD Travel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BCD Travel company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MSC Cruises company has not reported any.

In the current year, BCD Travel company and MSC Cruises company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BCD Travel company nor MSC Cruises company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BCD Travel company nor MSC Cruises company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BCD Travel company nor MSC Cruises company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

BCD Travel company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while MSC Cruises company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MSC Cruises nor BCD Travel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BCD Travel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MSC Cruises company.

BCD Travel company employs more people globally than MSC Cruises company, reflecting its scale as a Travel Arrangements.

Neither MSC Cruises nor BCD Travel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MSC Cruises nor BCD Travel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MSC Cruises nor BCD Travel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MSC Cruises nor BCD Travel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MSC Cruises nor BCD Travel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MSC Cruises nor BCD Travel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeaCMS up to 13.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file js/player/dmplayer/dmku/class/mysqli.class.php. Such manipulation of the argument page/limit leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Tormorten WP Microdata allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Microdata: from n/a through 1.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14(408). Affected is the function sprintf of the file /goform/SetIpBind. Such manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X