Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Medical Services of AmericaMedical Services of America
VS
The University of Texas Medical BranchThe University of Texas Medical Branch
Medical Services of America

Medical Services of America

171 Monroe Ln, Lexington, 29072, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
716/1000Moderate

Medical Services of America, Inc. (MSA) was founded in 1973 and has grown to become one of the nation’s leading privately-owned home healthcare providers. MSA began with a unique concept to become a “Total Home Health Care Provider” and the company’s expansion has been ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:925
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
The University of Texas Medical Branch

The University of Texas Medical Branch

301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, US, 77550

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://utmb.jobs
780/1000Fair

The first academic health center in Texas opened its doors in 1891 and today has four campuses, five health sciences schools, seven institutes for advanced study, a research enterprise that includes one of only two national laboratories dedicated to the safe study of in...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,743
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Medical Services of America

Medical Services of America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of Texas Medical Branch

The University of Texas Medical Branch

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical Services of America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas Medical Branch in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Medical Services of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical Services of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of Texas Medical Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas Medical Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Medical Services of America

Medical Services of America

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MSA1773153052
The University of Texas Medical Branch

The University of Texas Medical Branch

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Medical Services of America company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Medical Services of America and The University of Texas Medical Branch, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Medical Services of America and The University of Texas Medical Branch, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Medical Services of America or The University of Texas Medical Branch ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Medical Services of America or The University of Texas Medical Branch ?
Between Medical Services of America and The University of Texas Medical Branch, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Medical Services of America and The University of Texas Medical Branch, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA