Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MR DIY Business & Corporate SalesMR DIY Business & Corporate Sales
VS
Cencosud S.A.Cencosud S.A.
MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales

MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales

Lot 1907, Jalan KPB 11, Kawasan Perindustrian Balakong, Seri Kembangan, Selangor, MY, 43300

Last Update: 14/11/2025

View Profile
770/1000Fair

MR.DIY Business is our dedicated platform for MSME customers to procure all range of MR.DIY products in large quantity and deliver them to your business doorstep. Our services include one-step ordering and B2B FPX payment through this online store, as well as a team of ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cencosud S.A.

Cencosud S.A.

Argentina-Brasil-Chile-Colombia-Perú y Of.Comercial en China, OO

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cencosud.com
792/1000Fair

Cencosud S.A. is a Chilean based multi-format retailer with operations in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru and a commercial office in China. Through its supermarket, home improvement, department stores, shopping centers and financial services divisions, the ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:33,791
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales

MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cencosud S.A.

Cencosud S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cencosud S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cencosud S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cencosud S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales

MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cencosud S.A.

Cencosud S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales and Cencosud S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales and Cencosud S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales or Cencosud S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales or Cencosud S.A. ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales and Cencosud S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MR DIY Business & Corporate Sales and Cencosud S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2