Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)
VS
TelkomselTelkomsel
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Montevideo, UY

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
631/1000Poor

En Movistar (Telefónica Hispam), tenemos como Misión hacer nuestro mundo más humano, conectando la vida de las personas porque ellas son las que dan sentido a la tecnología y no al revés. Creemos que las conexiones más importantes son las conexiones humanas, por eso uni...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:10,239
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Telkomsel

Telkomsel

Telkomsel Smart Office - Kompleks Telkom Landmark Tower, Jakarta Selatan, 12710, ID

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telkomsel.com
774/1000Fair

Connecting Nation. Accelerating Indonesia's Future. As Indonesia's leading digital telecommunications company, Telkomsel is committed to building a connected, competitive, and future-ready society. For over 29 years, we've empowered individuals, homes, and businesses w...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,661
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Telkomsel

Telkomsel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) has 47.37% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telkomsel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Telkomsel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telkomsel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOVMOV1777552293
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOVTEL1767881948
Telkomsel

Telkomsel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
TEL212216123

FAQ

Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Telkomsel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Telkomsel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Telkomsel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) or Telkomsel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) or Telkomsel ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Telkomsel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Telkomsel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19961
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. Affected is the function formWlSiteSurvey of the file /goform/formWlSiteSurvey. Performing a manipulation of the argument selSSID results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19960
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This impacts the function formWlbasic of the file /goform/formWlbasic. Such manipulation of the argument rootAPmac leads to command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19959
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This affects the function formWanTcpipSetup of the file /goform/formWanTcpipSetup. This manipulation of the argument pppUserName causes stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19958
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in iatsiuk pptr-mcp up to 0.2.7. The impacted element is the function executeCode of the file src/vm-executor.ts of the component execute Tool. The manipulation results in code injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-19957
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in graphlit graphlit-mcp-server 1.0.1. This affects the function fetch of the file src/tools.ts of the component ssrf-test Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8