Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)
VS
PTCL.OfficialPTCL.Official
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Montevideo, UY

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
631/1000Poor

En Movistar (Telefónica Hispam), tenemos como Misión hacer nuestro mundo más humano, conectando la vida de las personas porque ellas son las que dan sentido a la tecnología y no al revés. Creemos que las conexiones más importantes son las conexiones humanas, por eso uni...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:10,239
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

Block-E, Sector G-8/4, Islamabad, 44000, PK

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ptcl.com.pk
793/1000Fair

𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻: To be the leading and most admired Telecom and ICT provider in and for Pakistan. 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: To be the partner of choice for our customers, to develop our people and to deliver value to our shareholders. 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲𝘀: Be resilie...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:22,945
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) has 49.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PTCL.Official in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PTCL.Official (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PTCL.Official cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOVMOV1777552293
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOVTEL1767881948
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and PTCL.Official, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and PTCL.Official, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) or PTCL.Official ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) or PTCL.Official ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and PTCL.Official, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and PTCL.Official, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA