Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)
VS
Motorola SolutionsMotorola Solutions
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Montevideo, UY

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
631/1000Poor

En Movistar (Telefónica Hispam), tenemos como Misión hacer nuestro mundo más humano, conectando la vida de las personas porque ellas son las que dan sentido a la tecnología y no al revés. Creemos que las conexiones más importantes son las conexiones humanas, por eso uni...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:10,239
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Motorola Solutions

Motorola Solutions

500 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, 60661, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

About Motorola Solutions | Solving for safer Safety and security are at the heart of everything we do at Motorola Solutions. We build and connect technologies to help protect people, property and places. Our solutions foster the collaboration that’s critical for safer ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:27,132
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Motorola Solutions

Motorola Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) has 47.37% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motorola Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Motorola Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motorola Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Movistar (Telefónica Hispam)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOVMOV1777552293
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOVTEL1767881948
Motorola Solutions

Motorola Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOT000011325

FAQ

Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) company and Motorola Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Motorola Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Motorola Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) or Motorola Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) or Motorola Solutions ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Motorola Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Movistar (Telefónica Hispam) and Motorola Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8