Comparison Overview
Mount Sinai St. Luke's
Mount Sinai St. Luke's
1111 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, 10025, US
Last Update: 20/02/2026
With 523 beds, St. Luke’s serves as the principal health care provider for the West Harlem and Morningside Heights communities and operates one of Manhattan’s few Level 1 trauma services. Founded in 1847, it is home to the Al-Sabah Arrhythmia Institute, a world-class, m...
Jefferson Health
130 South Ninth Street, Philadelphia, PA, US, 19107
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals are partners in providing excellent clinical and compassionate care for our patients in the Philadelphia region, educating the health professionals of tomorrow in a variety of disciplines and discover...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Mount Sinai St. Luke's
Jefferson Health
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mount Sinai St. Luke's in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jefferson Health in 2026.
Incident History - Mount Sinai St. Luke's (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mount Sinai St. Luke's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jefferson Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jefferson Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Mount Sinai St. Luke's
Jefferson Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.