Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)
VS
HARMAN InternationalHARMAN International
Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Chicago, 60654, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.motorola.com
792/1000Fair

As part of the Lenovo family, Motorola Mobility is creating innovative smartphones and accessories designed with the consumer in mind. That’s why we’re looking for the thinkers, innovators and problem solvers who believe in working together to challenge the status quo. ...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:17,495
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

400 Atlantic St, Stamford, 06901, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harman.com
796/1000Fair

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and serv...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:28,758
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) company and HARMAN International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) or HARMAN International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) or HARMAN International ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) and HARMAN International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Motorola Mobility (a Lenovo Company) and HARMAN International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1