Comparison Overview
Morningstar Investment Management Australia

Morningstar Investment Management Australia
100 Barangaroo Avenue, Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 20/02/2026
Here you’ll find information, content and resources designed around three integrated pillars to support you in running a modern advice practice: Investment Insights, Behavioural Coaching and Practice Optimisation. Ultimately, serving more clients, better. Our aim is ...

Sonae
Maia, Porto, 4470-177, PT
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Sonae exists to create a lasting positive impact on businesses, people, communities and on the planet. Managing a diverse portfolio of businesses in retail, financial services, technology, investments, real estate and telecommunications, Sonae makes the most of its ex...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Morningstar Investment Management Australia







Sonae






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Morningstar Investment Management Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sonae in 2026.
Incident History - Morningstar Investment Management Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Morningstar Investment Management Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sonae (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sonae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Morningstar Investment Management Australia

Sonae
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.