Comparison Overview
Morgan Sindall Group plc

Morgan Sindall Group plc
Kent House, London, W1W 8AJ, GB
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Morgan Sindall Group plc, the Partnerships, Fit Out and Construction Services Group, reported annual revenues of £4.5bn in full year 2024, employing over 8,000 employees and operating in the public, regulated and private sectors. It reports through six divisions of Part...

Turner Construction Company
375 Hudson Street, New York, 10014, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Turner is a North America-based, international construction services company and is a leading builder in diverse and numerous market segments. The company has earned recognition for undertaking large, complex projects, fostering innovation, embracing emerging technologi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Morgan Sindall Group plc







Turner Construction Company






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Morgan Sindall Group plc in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Turner Construction Company in 2026.
Incident History - Morgan Sindall Group plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Morgan Sindall Group plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Turner Construction Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Turner Construction Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Morgan Sindall Group plc

Turner Construction Company
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.