Comparison Overview
Moody's
Moody's
7 World Trade Center, New York, NY, 10007, US
Last Update: 14/03/2026
In an era where risks are multiplying and increasingly interconnected, Moody’s helps organizations make sense of the complexities. By combining data, intelligence, and risk expertise with groundbreaking technologies and a seamless customer experience, we deliver relevan...
Guaranty Trust
Plot 635, Akin Adesola, Victoria Island, Lagos State, Nigeria, Lagos, NG
Last Update: 04/08/2026
We are Guaranty Trust. Founded in 1990, we own and operate one of Africa's best managed banking franchises, serving over 24 million customers across 10 African countries and the United Kingdom. We are Proudly African and Truly International. We believe in getting it r...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Moody's
Guaranty Trust
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Moody's in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Guaranty Trust has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Moody's (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Moody's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Guaranty Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Guaranty Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Moody's
Guaranty Trust
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.