Comparison Overview

Moody's Corporation

VS

Absa Group

Moody's Corporation

250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, US, 10007
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.moodys.com

In a world shaped by increasingly interconnected risks, Moody’s helps customers develop a holistic view of these risks to advance their business and act decisively. With a rich history of expertise in global markets and a diverse workforce in more than 40 countries, Moody’s unites the brightest minds to turn today’s risks into tomorrow’s opportunities.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 15,041
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Absa Group

7th Floor, Absa Towers West, 15 Troye Street, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, ZA, 2001
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799
https://www.absa.africa/your-story-matters/

Absa Group Limited (Absa) has forged a new way of getting things done, driven by bravery and passion, with the readiness to realise growth on the African continent and beyond. We’re a truly African brand, inspired by the people we serve in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. We also have representative offices in China, Namibia, Nigeria and the United States, as well as securities entities in the United Kingdom and the United States, along with technology support colleagues in the Czech Republic.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 41,900
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moodys-corporation.jpeg
Moody's Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/absa.jpeg
Absa Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Moody's Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Absa Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moody's Corporation in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Absa Group in 2026.

Incident History — Moody's Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moody's Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Absa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Absa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moodys-corporation.jpeg
Moody's Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/absa.jpeg
Absa Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Moody's Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Absa Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Absa Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Moody's Corporation company.

In the current year, Absa Group company and Moody's Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Absa Group company nor Moody's Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Absa Group company nor Moody's Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Absa Group company nor Moody's Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Moody's Corporation company nor Absa Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Moody's Corporation nor Absa Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Moody's Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Absa Group company.

Absa Group company employs more people globally than Moody's Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Moody's Corporation nor Absa Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Moody's Corporation nor Absa Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Moody's Corporation nor Absa Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Moody's Corporation nor Absa Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Moody's Corporation nor Absa Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Moody's Corporation nor Absa Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References