Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Montrose Environmental GroupMontrose Environmental Group
VS
Rentokil InitialRentokil Initial
Montrose Environmental Group

Montrose Environmental Group

5120 Northshore Dr, None, Little Rock, Arkansas, US, 72118

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.montrose-env.com/
712/1000Moderate

Montrose Environmental was one of the first to see environmental responsibility as not just an imperative but as a strategic asset. And we’re well ahead of the curve in applying the latest technologies in practical ways to solve difficult environmental challenges. How?...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:2,262
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Rentokil Initial

Rentokil Initial

Compass House, Manor Royal, Crawley, RH10 9PY, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Rentokil Initial plc employs c.68,500 people across 89 countries - offering the experience and expertise of a multi-national organisation, whilst delivering services with the agility and characteristics of a local business. As world leaders in Pest Control and Hygiene...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:12,146
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Montrose Environmental Group

Montrose Environmental Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rentokil Initial

Rentokil Initial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Montrose Environmental Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rentokil Initial in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Montrose Environmental Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Montrose Environmental Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rentokil Initial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rentokil Initial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Montrose Environmental Group

Montrose Environmental Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MON356072825
Rentokil Initial

Rentokil Initial

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group company and Rentokil Initial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group and Rentokil Initial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group and Rentokil Initial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Montrose Environmental Group or Rentokil Initial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Montrose Environmental Group or Rentokil Initial ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group and Rentokil Initial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Montrose Environmental Group and Rentokil Initial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA