Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Montgomery County GovernmentMontgomery County Government
VS
I WORK FOR SAI WORK FOR SA
Montgomery County Government

Montgomery County Government

101 Monroe Street, Rockville, 20850, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

We pursue the common good by working for and with Montgomery County’s diverse community members to provide: * A Responsive and Accountable County Government * Affordable Housing in an Inclusive Community * An Effective and Efficient Transportation Netwo...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:5,953
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

200, Victoria Square / Tarndanyangga, Adelaide, 5000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://iworkfor.sa.gov.au
779/1000Fair

The OFFICIAL careers page for the South Australian Government. The South Australian Public Sector is the State's largest workforce. We are an employer of choice that reflects the diverse community we serve. Our people are from a range of backgrounds and vocations, fro...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:19,039
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Montgomery County Government

Montgomery County Government

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Montgomery County Government in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I WORK FOR SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Montgomery County Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Montgomery County Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - I WORK FOR SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I WORK FOR SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Montgomery County Government

Montgomery County Government

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MON23519623
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Montgomery County Government company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Montgomery County Government and I WORK FOR SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Montgomery County Government and I WORK FOR SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Montgomery County Government or I WORK FOR SA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Montgomery County Government or I WORK FOR SA ?
Between Montgomery County Government and I WORK FOR SA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Montgomery County Government and I WORK FOR SA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA