Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Montana Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
VS
City of Cape TownCity of Cape Town
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks

1420 EAST 6TH AVENUE, HELENA, 59620, US

Last Update: 18/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://fwp.mt.gov
735/1000Moderate

The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) is a government agency in the executive branch state of Montana in the United States with responsibility for protecting sustainable fish, wildlife, and state-owned park resources in Montana for the purpose of provid...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:344
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
City of Cape Town

City of Cape Town

12 Hertzog Blvd, Cape Town, Western Cape, ZA, 8001

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.capetown.gov.za
789/1000Fair

Cape Town, or the Mother City, is South Africa’s oldest city, its second-most populous and the legislative capital. It is made up of a diverse population, a rich history, world-famous tourist attractions and an exciting calendar of international and local events. More ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:22,387
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
City of Cape Town

City of Cape Town

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks has 31.51% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Cape Town in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - City of Cape Town (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Cape Town cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MON1776543857
City of Cape Town

City of Cape Town

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks company and City of Cape Town company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks and City of Cape Town, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks and City of Cape Town, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks or City of Cape Town ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks or City of Cape Town ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks and City of Cape Town, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks and City of Cape Town, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48579
SUMMARY

Improper authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48567
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass by spoofing in Azure HorizonDB allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-47655
SUMMARY

Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Microsoft Graph allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-47644
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Copilot Chat (Microsoft Edge) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45497
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Copilot allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8