Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Montana State University-BozemanMontana State University-Bozeman
VS
Indiana University BloomingtonIndiana University Bloomington
Montana State University-Bozeman

Montana State University-Bozeman

Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, US, 59717

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.montana.edu
764/1000Fair

Montana State University, the state's land-grant institution, educates students, creates knowledge and art, and serves communities by integrating learning, discovery, and engagement. Montana State University is as remarkable as its setting. Created as a land-grant inst...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:5,445
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Indiana University Bloomington

Indiana University Bloomington

107 S Indiana Ave, Bloomington, Indiana, US, 47405

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://bloomington.iu.edu
810/1000Good

Indiana University Bloomington is the flagship residential, research-intensive campus of Indiana University. Its academic excellence is grounded in the humanities, arts and sciences, and a range of highly ranked professional programs. Founded in 1820, the campus serve...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:29,998
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Montana State University-Bozeman

Montana State University-Bozeman

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Indiana University Bloomington

Indiana University Bloomington

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Montana State University-Bozeman in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indiana University Bloomington in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Montana State University-Bozeman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Montana State University-Bozeman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Indiana University Bloomington (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indiana University Bloomington cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Montana State University-Bozeman

Montana State University-Bozeman

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MON22023423
Indiana University Bloomington

Indiana University Bloomington

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman company and Indiana University Bloomington company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman and Indiana University Bloomington, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman and Indiana University Bloomington, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Montana State University-Bozeman or Indiana University Bloomington ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Montana State University-Bozeman or Indiana University Bloomington ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman and Indiana University Bloomington, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Montana State University-Bozeman and Indiana University Bloomington, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2