Comparison Overview
Monster Cloud

Monster Cloud
1119A S 21st Ave, Hollywood, Florida, US, 33020
Last Update: 09/10/2026
MonsterCloud offers a comprehensive cyber security platform providing companies with both the technology and, more importantly, expertise needed to defend themselves from hackers, data breaches, ransomware and other external threats. It reduces reputational risk and aff...

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
Suwalska 19/1, Poznan, 60-461, PL
Last Update: 21/09/2026
## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. O...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Monster Cloud







NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Monster Cloud has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS in 2026.
Incident History - Monster Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Monster Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Monster Cloud

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.