Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Monolith Productions (WB Games)Monolith Productions (WB Games)
VS
Keywords StudiosKeywords Studios
Monolith Productions (WB Games)

Monolith Productions (WB Games)

12131 113th Avenue, Kirkland, 98034, US

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://warnerbrosgames.com/
751/1000Fair

Monolith Productions has closed as of March 2025. With more than 30 years of innovation and excellence in games, Monolith Productions was a game development studio located in Kirkland, WA focused on creating authentic, immersive worlds which expanded the possibilities ...

NAICS:51126
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Keywords Studios

Keywords Studios

Whelan House, Dublin, 18, IE

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

We work behind the scenes with game developers, publishers, and entertainment companies to bring their ideas to life and keep them running smoothly. From game development and art production to audio services, localization, game testing, community support, and marketing,...

NAICS:51126
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,900
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Monolith Productions (WB Games)

Monolith Productions (WB Games)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Keywords Studios

Keywords Studios

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monolith Productions (WB Games) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keywords Studios in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Monolith Productions (WB Games) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monolith Productions (WB Games) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Keywords Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keywords Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Monolith Productions (WB Games)

Monolith Productions (WB Games)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Keywords Studios

Keywords Studios

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) company and Keywords Studios company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) and Keywords Studios, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) and Keywords Studios, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Monolith Productions (WB Games) or Keywords Studios ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Monolith Productions (WB Games) or Keywords Studios ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) and Keywords Studios, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Monolith Productions (WB Games) and Keywords Studios, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-102335
SUMMARY

Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 fails to restrict the advanced_config field to administrators, allowing non-admin users with manage permissions to inject arbitrary nginx directives. Attackers can inject malicious nginx configuration such as alias directives to serve arbitrary files or control routing for their assigned hosts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-102334
SUMMARY

Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 lacks rate-limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any account. Attackers can brute-force login credentials via POST /api/tokens and subsequently guess TOTP codes via POST /api/tokens/2fa to gain full session access and administrative control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-102333
SUMMARY

httpdbg before 2.2.1 fails to validate URL schemes in recorded HTTP request URLs rendered as clickable links in the web interface. Attackers controlling traffic recorded by httpdbg can supply javascript: scheme URLs that execute malicious scripts in the application origin when clicked, allowing access to captured request and response data including headers and tokens.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-102332
SUMMARY

Dozzle versions before 11.1.2 fail to sanitize container display names when building ZIP archive entry names in the log download endpoint. Attackers who can label containers can use path traversal sequences to write files outside the extraction directory when users download and extract logs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-101262
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/ZRQos/set_online_client. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3