Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Monetico Split (Paysurf)Monetico Split (Paysurf)
VS
Danske BankDanske Bank
Monetico Split (Paysurf)

Monetico Split (Paysurf)

4 Rue Frédéric-Guillaume-Raiffeisen , Strasbourg, 67000, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Monetico Split est la solution d’encaissement de fonds pour compte de tiers qui s’engage à vos côtés. En tant que solution d’encaissement de Crédit Mutuel et CIC, nous simplifions vos paiements pour vous permettre de vous concentrer pleinement sur le développement de v...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danske Bank

Danske Bank

Bernstorffsgade 40, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, DK, 1577

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danskebank.com
809/1000Good

Danske Bank – A driver of growth and development For more than a 150 years, Danske Bank has strived to be a driver of growth and development in society. We have developed in tandem with the societies we are part of, and our advisory services, expertise and financial so...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:18,488
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Monetico Split (Paysurf)

Monetico Split (Paysurf)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danske Bank

Danske Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monetico Split (Paysurf) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danske Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Monetico Split (Paysurf) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monetico Split (Paysurf) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danske Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danske Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Monetico Split (Paysurf)

Monetico Split (Paysurf)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danske Bank

Danske Bank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) company and Danske Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) and Danske Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) and Danske Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Monetico Split (Paysurf) or Danske Bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Monetico Split (Paysurf) or Danske Bank ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) and Danske Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Monetico Split (Paysurf) and Danske Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-26422
SUMMARY

clash-verge-service-ipc before 2.3.0 has a world-reachable IPC endpoint, leading to local privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-11441
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function canAccessIssue of the file /issues/ of the component Pull Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument issue leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11440
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /repositories/{projectId}/default-branch of the component REST API. This manipulation of the argument project.defaultBranch causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to mitigate this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11439
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /projects/ of the component Parent Project Handler. The manipulation of the argument project.parentId results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 can resolve this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11438
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /projects. The manipulation of the argument project.forkedFromId leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 addresses this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8