Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Monash Information TechnologyMonash Information Technology
VS
Washington University in St. LouisWashington University in St. Louis
Monash Information Technology

Monash Information Technology

20 Exhibition Walk, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, AU

Last Update: 28/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.monash.edu/it
769/1000Fair

Adopting a global outlook, we form a powerful community of the best minds in information technology (IT) and computer science. Skilled educators who inspire and empower. Talented researchers who innovate and disrupt. Out of Australia’s prestigious Group of Eight unive...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:55
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Washington University in St. Louis

Washington University in St. Louis

One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, mo, US, 63130-4899

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://washu.edu
799/1000Fair

Washington University in St. Louis, a medium-sized, independent university, is dedicated to challenging its faculty and students alike to seek new knowledge and greater understanding of an ever-changing, multicultural world. The university has played an integral role in...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:17,820
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Monash Information Technology

Monash Information Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Washington University in St. Louis

Washington University in St. Louis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monash Information Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington University in St. Louis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Monash Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monash Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Washington University in St. Louis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington University in St. Louis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Monash Information Technology

Monash Information Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Washington University in St. Louis

Washington University in St. Louis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Monash Information Technology company and Washington University in St. Louis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Monash Information Technology and Washington University in St. Louis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Monash Information Technology and Washington University in St. Louis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Monash Information Technology or Washington University in St. Louis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Monash Information Technology or Washington University in St. Louis ?
Between Monash Information Technology and Washington University in St. Louis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Monash Information Technology and Washington University in St. Louis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8