Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Moffatt & Nichol Moffatt & Nichol
VS
GHDGHD
Moffatt & Nichol

Moffatt & Nichol

4225 E Conant St, Long Beach, 90808, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.moffattnichol.com
746/1000Moderate

Moffatt & Nichol is a leading U.S.-based global infrastructure advisor specializing in the planning and design of facilities that shape and serve our coastlines, harbors and rivers, as well as an innovator in the transportation complexities associated with the movement ...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:1,218
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
GHD

GHD

133 Castlereagh St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ghd.com
790/1000Fair

We are committed to addressing the world’s biggest challenges in the areas of water, energy and communities. GHD is a global network of multi-disciplinary professionals providing clients with integrated solutions through engineering, environmental, design and construct...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:16,813
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Moffatt & Nichol

Moffatt & Nichol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GHD

GHD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moffatt & Nichol in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GHD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Moffatt & Nichol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moffatt & Nichol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GHD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GHD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Moffatt & Nichol

Moffatt & Nichol

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MOF59100659112625
GHD

GHD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and GHD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Moffatt & Nichol or GHD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Moffatt & Nichol or GHD ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and GHD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and GHD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2