Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Moffatt & Nichol Moffatt & Nichol
VS
AECOMAECOM
Moffatt & Nichol

Moffatt & Nichol

4225 E Conant St, Long Beach, 90808, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.moffattnichol.com
746/1000Moderate

Moffatt & Nichol is a leading U.S.-based global infrastructure advisor specializing in the planning and design of facilities that shape and serve our coastlines, harbors and rivers, as well as an innovator in the transportation complexities associated with the movement ...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:1,218
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
AECOM

AECOM

13355 Noel Road, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas, US, 75240

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aecom.com
782/1000Fair

AECOM is the global infrastructure leader, committed to delivering a better world. As a trusted professional services firm powered by deep technical abilities, we solve our clients’ complex challenges in water, environment, energy, transportation and buildings. Our team...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:74,394
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Moffatt & Nichol

Moffatt & Nichol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AECOM

AECOM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moffatt & Nichol in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AECOM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Moffatt & Nichol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moffatt & Nichol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AECOM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AECOM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Moffatt & Nichol

Moffatt & Nichol

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MOF59100659112625
AECOM

AECOM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AEC745072725

FAQ

Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol company and AECOM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and AECOM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and AECOM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Moffatt & Nichol or AECOM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Moffatt & Nichol or AECOM ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and AECOM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Moffatt & Nichol and AECOM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA