Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Moët & ChandonMoët & Chandon
VS
Pernod RicardPernod Ricard
Moët & Chandon

Moët & Chandon

FR

Last Update: 27/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.moet.com
779/1000Fair

Since 1743, Moët & Chandon has set the standard for champagne, uniting heritage, innovation, and craftsmanship. As one of the world's largest champagne producers and a leading house within Moët Hennessy, the Wine & Spirits division of LVMH, we are driven by a rich heri...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:748
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pernod Ricard

Pernod Ricard

5 cour Paul Ricard, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.pernod-ricard.com
811/1000Good

Pernod Ricard is a convivial, responsible and successful global wine and spirits group and the #1 premium spirits organisation in the world. The Group represents 240 premium brands available in more than 160 countries. We are 18,500 exceptionally talented people worldwi...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:19,364
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Moët & Chandon

Moët & Chandon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pernod Ricard

Pernod Ricard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moët & Chandon in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pernod Ricard in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Moët & Chandon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moët & Chandon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pernod Ricard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pernod Ricard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Moët & Chandon

Moët & Chandon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pernod Ricard

Pernod Ricard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Moët & Chandon company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Moët & Chandon and Pernod Ricard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Moët & Chandon and Pernod Ricard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Moët & Chandon or Pernod Ricard ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Moët & Chandon or Pernod Ricard ?
Between Moët & Chandon and Pernod Ricard, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Moët & Chandon and Pernod Ricard, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2