Comparison Overview
Mobilize

Mobilize
15 Rue d'Uzès, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75002
Last Update: 27/02/2026
Everyone moves in their own way. But the one thing we all have in common? The desire to make those moves more sustainable. That’s why at Mobilize, our goal is not to change the way you move, but to reimagine and revolutionize it. And how do we do that? By reinventing ...

Fosun 复星
600, ZHONGSHAN NO.2 ROAD(E) SHANGHAI, 200010 PRC, Shanghai, CN, 200010
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Fosun was founded in 1992. After more than 30 years of development, Fosun has become a global innovation-driven consumer group. Adhering to the mission of creating happier lives for families worldwide, Fosun is committed to creating a global happiness ecosystem fulfilli...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mobilize







Fosun 复星






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mobilize in 2026.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fosun 复星 in 2026.
Incident History - Mobilize (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mobilize cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fosun 复星 (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fosun 复星 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mobilize

Fosun 复星
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.