Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.
VS
BB&TBB&T
J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.

J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.

161, Rue du Kiem, Strassen, L-8030, LU

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Volkswagen Payments S.A. became J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A., following the joint venture of Volkswagen Financial Services AG and J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. is an Electronic Money Institution based in Strassen, Luxembourg...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BB&T

BB&T

214 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, undefined, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bbt.com
777/1000Fair

We’d love to stay connected with you! Please follow our Truist company page and unfollow this page which is no longer active. BB&T and SunTrust formed Truist with a shared purpose—to inspire and build better lives and communities. With our combined resources, collectiv...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:13,573
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.

J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BB&T

BB&T

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BB&T in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BB&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BB&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.

J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BB&T

BB&T

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. company and BB&T company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. and BB&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. and BB&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. or BB&T ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. or BB&T ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. and BB&T, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solutions S.A. and BB&T, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3