Comparison Overview
Mobility Australia Pty Ltd

Mobility Australia Pty Ltd
undefined, Subiaco, WA, 6008, AU
Last Update: 29/12/2025
Connecting the aged care and disability support sectors across Australia. Our 3-sided marketplace allows providers and clients to choose from a range of qualified and vetted support workers, matched to their requirements, for the care or support they need, when they n...

Highmark Health
120 5th Ave, Pittsburgh, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
A national blended health organization, Highmark Health and our leading businesses support millions of customers with products, services and solutions closely aligned to our mission of creating remarkable health experiences, freeing people to be their best. Headquarter...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mobility Australia Pty Ltd







Highmark Health






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mobility Australia Pty Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Highmark Health in 2026.
Incident History - Mobility Australia Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mobility Australia Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Highmark Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Highmark Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mobility Australia Pty Ltd

Highmark Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.