MPC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
MPC
Company Information
Website:http://www.mpc.es
Employees number:179
Number of followers:966
NAICS:517
Industry Type:Telecommunications
Homepage:mpc.es
MPC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
MPCTelecommunications
Updated:
23/03/2026
23/03/2026
736/1000
Moderate
Ba
MPC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
MPCTelecommunications
Score locked

MPCModerate
Current Score
736Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
-20 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
738
JUNE 2026
737
MAY 2026
736
APRIL 2026
736
MARCH 2026
755
Cyber Attack
10 Mar 2026 • MPC
Enterprises affected by SIM swap attacks and Mobile carriers: SIM Swaps Expose a Critical Flaw in Identity Security
SIM Swap Attacks Expose Critical Flaws in Mobile-Based Authentication
735
CRITICAL-20
EFAMOB1773254974
SIM Swap Attacks Expose Critical Flaws in Mobile-Based Authentication
For years, organizations have relied on mobile phone numbers as trusted identity anchors for password resets, one-time passcodes (OTPs), and multi-factor authentication (MFA). However, SIM swap attacks have revealed a fundamental weakness in this approach, enabling attackers to bypass security controls and seize control of high-value accounts.
In a SIM swap attack, criminals manipulate mobile carrier representatives through social engineering or insider collusion to transfer a victim’s phone number to a SIM card under their control. Once reassigned, attackers intercept SMS-based authentication codes, initiate password resets, and gain access to email, banking, cryptocurrency wallets, cloud services, and social media. The attack exploits process vulnerabilities rather than technical flaws, making it both scalable and effective.
Authorities have investigated thousands of SIM swap cases in recent years, with reported losses reaching millions. The threat has grown due to widespread breached data, refined social engineering tactics, and inconsistent telecom verification processes. Unlike traditional fraud, SIM swapping enables systemic compromise, as control of a single phone number can cascade across multiple accounts.
Enterprise Risk on the Rise
SIM swap attacks are no longer limited to individual consumers employees, executives, and system administrators are prime targets. If an attacker compromises an employee’s number, they can bypass SMS-based MFA protecting corporate email, VPNs, and cloud access, leading to lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration. Privileged accounts, in particular, present lucrative opportunities for attackers seeking intellectual property, financial systems, or strategic communications.
The Limits of SMS Authentication
While SMS-based authentication improved security over passwords alone, it remains a low-assurance factor. Vulnerable to SIM swapping, telecom network weaknesses, and malware, SMS depends on infrastructure outside an organization’s control. High-value accounts and sensitive systems require stronger, phishing-resistant authentication methods.
Mitigation Strategies
To reduce risk, organizations should:
- Replace SMS with phishing-resistant authentication, such as hardware security keys, passkeys, or device-bound authenticator apps.
- Harden account recovery by requiring cryptographically verifiable or device-bound verification methods, avoiding reliance on phone numbers as standalone recovery factors.
- Implement identity threat detection to monitor anomalies like sudden authentication changes, impossible travel patterns, or rapid password resets.
- Enforce least privilege and privileged access management, ensuring compromised identities do not grant broad system access.
The Role of Telecom Providers
Telecom carriers play a critical role in mitigating SIM swap risks. High-risk actions, such as SIM swaps, should trigger enhanced verification, behavioral analytics, and real-time customer notifications. Strengthening verification processes beyond static personal data can reduce downstream enterprise risk.
SIM swap attacks highlight a critical flaw in legacy identity assumptions phone numbers were never designed to serve as secure credentials. As identity becomes the primary security perimeter, organizations must eliminate low-assurance factors, strengthen recovery workflows, and adopt continuous identity threat detection to counter this growing threat.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
FEBRUARY 2026
755
JANUARY 2026
755
DECEMBER 2025
755
NOVEMBER 2025
755
OCTOBER 2025
755
SEPTEMBER 2025
755
AUGUST 2025
755
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MPC ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on MPC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MPC ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view MPC's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?