Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mobile County Health DepartmentMobile County Health Department
VS
American Heart AssociationAmerican Heart Association
Mobile County Health Department

Mobile County Health Department

251 N Bayou St, Mobile, Alabama, 36603, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://mchd.org/
769/1000Fair

The Mobile County Health Department is here to provide a healthy, safe, prepared and educated community. Our mission is to promote, improve and protect the overall health of Mobile County. We hope to accomplish this by enhancing revenue, strengthening organizational emp...

NAICS:713
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:302
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
American Heart Association

American Heart Association

7272 Greenville Ave, Dallas, 75231-4596, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.heart.org
775/1000Fair

Welcome to the American Heart Association’s movement to change the future of health and be the progress that ensures longer, healthier lives for all. By driving breakthroughs in science, policy, and care – together -- we can overcome today’s biggest health challenges a...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:11,562
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mobile County Health Department

Mobile County Health Department

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
American Heart Association

American Heart Association

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mobile County Health Department in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Heart Association in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mobile County Health Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mobile County Health Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - American Heart Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Heart Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mobile County Health Department

Mobile County Health Department

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
American Heart Association

American Heart Association

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AME210072825

FAQ

Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mobile County Health Department company and American Heart Association company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mobile County Health Department and American Heart Association, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mobile County Health Department and American Heart Association, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mobile County Health Department or American Heart Association ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mobile County Health Department or American Heart Association ?
Between Mobile County Health Department and American Heart Association, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mobile County Health Department and American Heart Association, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1